Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 437-450, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-927109

ABSTRACT

Bone graft materials have mixed effects of bone repair in the field of oral maxillofacial surgery. The qualitative analyses performed by previous studies imply that autogenous odontogenic materials and autogenous bone have similar effects on bone repair in clinical jaw bone transplantation. This retrospective systematic assessment and network metaanalysis aimed to analyze the best effect of clinical application of autogenous odontogenic materials and autogenous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic bone grafts in bone defect repair. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other journal databases using selected keywords and Medical Subject Headings search terms. 10 Papers (n = 466) that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The assessment of heterogeneity did not reveal any overall statistical difference or heterogeneity (P = 0.051 [ 0.05), whereas the comparison between autogenous and allogeneic bone grafts revealed local heterogeneity (P = 0.071 0.1). Risk of bias revealed nine unclear studies and one high-risk study. The overall consistency was good (P = 0.065 [ 0.05), and the local inconsistency test did not reveal any inconsistency. The publication bias was good. The confidence regarding the ranking of bone graft materials after GRADE classification was moderate. The effects on bone repair in the descending order were as follows: autogenous odontogenic materials, xenogeneic bone, autogenous bone, and allogeneic bone. This result indicates that the autogenous odontogenic materials displayed stronger effects on bone repair compared to other bone graft materials. Autogenous odontogenic materials have broad development prospects in oral maxillofacial surgery.

2.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 327-341, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-904088

ABSTRACT

Autogenous odontogenic materials are a new, highly biocompatible option for jaw restoration. The inorganic component of autogenous teeth acts as a scaffold to maintain the volume and enable donor cell attachment and proliferation; the organic component contains various growth factors that promote bone reconstruction and repair. The composition of dentin is similar to that of bone, which can be a rationale for promoting bone reconstruction. Recent advances have been made in the field of autogenous odontogenic materials, and studies have confirmed their safety and feasibility after successful clinical application. Autogenous odontogenic materials have unique characteristics compared with other bone-repair materials, such as the conventional autogenous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic bone substitutes. To encourage further research into odontogenic bone grafts, we compared the composition, osteogenesis, and development of autogenous odontogenic materials with those of other bone grafts. In conclusion, odontogenic bone grafts should be classified as a novel bone substitute.

3.
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine ; (6): 327-341, 2021.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-896384

ABSTRACT

Autogenous odontogenic materials are a new, highly biocompatible option for jaw restoration. The inorganic component of autogenous teeth acts as a scaffold to maintain the volume and enable donor cell attachment and proliferation; the organic component contains various growth factors that promote bone reconstruction and repair. The composition of dentin is similar to that of bone, which can be a rationale for promoting bone reconstruction. Recent advances have been made in the field of autogenous odontogenic materials, and studies have confirmed their safety and feasibility after successful clinical application. Autogenous odontogenic materials have unique characteristics compared with other bone-repair materials, such as the conventional autogenous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic bone substitutes. To encourage further research into odontogenic bone grafts, we compared the composition, osteogenesis, and development of autogenous odontogenic materials with those of other bone grafts. In conclusion, odontogenic bone grafts should be classified as a novel bone substitute.

4.
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 549-553, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-427281

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the inhibition effects of an hTERT-promoter-dependent oncolytic adenovirus Ad-VT that expresses apoptin on human prostatic carcinoma cell PC-3. Methods MTT assay was used to measure viability of PC-3 cell which was infected by recombinant adenovirus.The viability was measured at time points of 12,24,36,48,60,72,84 and 96 h after infection.AO/EB staining,DAPI staining,Annexin V assay were used to investigate the lethal effect and style of Ad-VT on PC-3 cell in vitro.The Caspases were measured by whole cell extraction of PC-3 cells 48hrs after infection. Results Ad-VT,Ad-VP3 and Ad-GT inhibited the proliferation of PC-3 cell in vitro.Ad-VT and Ad-GT were more effective than Ad-VP3 on cell growth,P < 0.05.At 48,72,96 h time points,the inhibition effect of Ad-VT on PC-3 cell exhibited a dose related manner.When infection at MOI 100,the inhibition effect of Ad-VT on PC-3 cells exhibited time related manner.The AO/EB staining,DAPI staining,Annexin V assay,Annexin V assays and Caspase assays showed that Ad-VT inhibited the proliferation of PC-3 cells by inducing apoptosis of prostate cancer cells,Loss of cytoplasmic membrane integrity. Conclusions The hTERT-promoterdependent oncolytic adenovirus Ad-VT could effectively suppress prostate cancer cells PC-3 growth.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL